In the past week, two people employed by New Zealand active fund managers have published pieces arguing that the SPIVA scorecard (the research S&P Dow Jones Indices has produced since 2002 comparing active funds against market indices) makes active management look worse than it is. You can find the Aurellan article here and the NZ Herald article here.
They are not entirely wrong. That's worth saying clearly before I say anything else, because parts of both arguments are good and the passive case doesn't need to pretend otherwise […..]










